Basics of HEG Neurofeedback
By Dr Ernesto Sholomo Korenman, December 2005
Introduction
HEG (Hemo-Encephalo-Graphy ) biofeedback is an effective and drugless treatment
for many neuropsychological conditions which involves the self-regulation of cortical
activation.
HEG represents a simple and non-intrusive way for both: monitoring and training
cerebral function without the inconvenience of electrode preparation which other
neurofeedback methods generally require.
HEG has high compliance by clients and patients and the training can be delivered
with a help of entertaining and attractive feedback suitable for children and adults.
Physiological Basis
HEG devices measure and feed back changes correlated with blood flow dynamics
and cellular metabolism in localized parts of the brain cortex. These measurements
are closely correlated with brain activation due to a phenomenon called
“neurovascular coupling”. Briefly, blood carries all the nutrients and oxygen needed
to fuel neuronal activation and the localized delivery of blood supply to each part of
the cortex is closely linked to the particular metabolic requirements and the level of
neuronal activity in that region at every single moment.
The logic behind this biofeedback intervention is that repeatedly engaging in HEG
biofeedback, "exercises" the brain in a unique way which confers very promising and
long lasting neuro-behavioural benefits for the trainee. Special pre/post SPECT
(Single Positron Emission Computerized Tomography) imaging techniques has been
already used to verify that HEG biofeedback treatment promotes conspicuous blood
flow increases, (activation), below the treated areas.
History
State of the art HEG methodology is originally based on brain monitoring
technologies like nIR Spectrophotometry and Thermoscopy developed in the last 10-
15 years.
In 1994 Dr. Hershel Toomim developed his own nIR Spectrophotometer
methodology and subsequently was the first to show that that the monitored activity
can be self-regulated by biofeedback means. His early work on the application of nIR
HEG biofeedback in the treatment of ADD and ADHD and other neurobehavioral
conditions followed soon after that.
Slightly afterwards, Dr. Jeff Carmen started experimenting to build and test a device
to measure cerebrovascular activation using passive infrared technology in an attempt
to both monitor migraine activity and to train control over the associated abnormal
cerebrovascular behavior. In 1998 Dr Carmen formally reported success in the
treatment of migraine through pIR HEG biofeedback.
In the last five years other researchers and clinicians have joined this exciting area of
neurofeedback, (mainly in the USA). However, this technology is still considered to
be the newest modality addition to the central biofeedback practice and a therapeutic
tool with extremely promising future.
Methodology
There are two types of HEG measurement in current use:
1. nIR HEG: Active near infrared HEG measures changes in the relative
absorption of red and infrared light passed into the tissue below the nIR
sensor. The light traverses scalp and skull and reaches brain tissue and the
ratio of red to infrared light received back by the sensor is dependent on
localized blood perfusion and oxygenation in the underlying tissue. This
method is used by Hershel Tommim in his instruments.
2. pIR HEG: Passive infrared HEG measures the heat (IR emission) radiated by
the tissue below the pIR HEG sensor, which is dependent on the localized
blood perfusion and metabolic activity in that region. This method is used by
Jeff Carmen in his instruments.
With both modalities of HEG, there are no electrodes to be applied to the skin, no
electrode gels to be used to improve skin contact and no impedance criteria to insure
reliable recordings. HEG does not measure electrical activity; therefore, there are no
big problems with eye blinking, eye movements, ECG cardiac signals or other muscle
source of artifact.
Nevertheless, some care should be exercise when applying HEG biofeedback in order
to avoid artifactual readings. Possible known sources of data contamination are:
a) Positional changes of the subject. This changes cranial blood pressure and
affects perfusion. It can be controlled by observing the subject.
b) Direct flow of cold air from an air conditioner or extremely high temperatures
in the clinic that lead to forehead sweating.
c) Effects of small skin blemishes, inflammation or hair under the HEG sensors.
The actual details of the monitored display used to feedback HEG data can vary
slightly depending on the instrument and software application used. However, HEG
biofeedback practice is always straightforward for the trainee:
If the user maintains a relaxed but focused state of active concentration, the displayed
graph keeps moving upwards, the digital display of data keeps increasing and, (when
shown), a movie display keeps playing on. If there is a reduction in active focus by
relaxing too much, trying too hard, or becoming tense, frustrated, excited or stressed,
the graph reading and digital display drop and by reaching a pre-determined threshold
value the movie goes into pause mode and returns to play mode only when the trainee
regains active focus and raise the reading above the threshold value. Of course, the
threshold difficulty variable is controlled by the neurofeedback therapist and can be
made easier or more challenging, depending on the skill level of the trainee.
Figure 1. Display of nIR HEG during biofeedback training
HEG and Frontal Lobe activation
HEG cannot be easily measured through human hair and is particularly suited to be
applied over the forehead, (Fp1, Fpz and Fp2), in order to entrain the prefrontal
ortex. c
While the pre-frontal cortex represents only 29% of neocortex they mediate some of
the most advanced forms of thinking and cognitive activity by human beings. The prefrontal
lobes host the "executive attention networks" and their engagement is required
in order to sustain complex thinking, focused concentration, emotional tone and
eneral arousal. g
Frontal activation appears to be necessary to succeed in the treatment of many
neurobehavioral conditions such as ADD and ADHD. QEEG topographic brain maps
and functional MRI images of ADHD patients identify the prefrontal lobes as
dysfunctional or even "disconnected" from the rest of the brain through the presence
f excessive slow wave activity instead of desirable fast wave activity. o
Since the prefrontal lobes mediate so many complex, auto-regulatory brain functions,
they would seem to be the best choice of all brain lobes to be the target for HEG
raining. t
Clinical applications
Although HEG instruments are relatively new devices, increases in brain blood flow
via HEG neurofeedback have already shown significant clinical benefits, especially in
the areas of migraine, depression and ADHD.
Figure 2. TOVA gains after EEG and HEG biofeedback treatment
With permission from H Toomim et.al. 2005
In addition, HEG biofeedback has promising clinical potential for many types of
learning, perceptual, cognitive, neurological and neurobehavioral disorders, such as
ODD, OCD, Tourette's, Asperger's and mild Autism, as well as mild to severe head
rauma, closed head injuries and seizure disorders. t
It is important to note that HEG does not replace EEG; some therapists claim they
work best when both methods are used together. However, HEG appears to often be
superior to EEG when the QEEG brain map and/or other clinical indicators suggest a
eed for prefrontal lobe training. n
Example of temporary frontal activation through HEG biofeedback
I have recently developed a method for mapping forehead IR emissions. The
technique is only in his early experimental stage and its clinical significance is
currently under discussion. However, these maps may provide useful information
about the topographical activation of frontal lobes in general and the effect of HEG
raining in particular. t
Here follows a pre/post IR forehead mapping of a girl (12 years old) diagnosed with
dyslexia + ADHD taken before and after 10 minutes over the centre of the forehead
(Fpz).
Figure 3. Forehead IR emission maps before and after 10 mins of nIR HEG on Fpz
The whole left side of the picture seems to be less active than the right one in the pretreatment
map. There is a clear “colder” (less active) spot centrally over the left eye
that remains in IR maps before and after treatment. However, after just 10 minutes of
Fpz HEG training the whole of the frontal lobe appears to be clearly activated.